U.S. Department of Justice, Office Of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships - Safer Neighborhoods
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Working for Youth Justice and Safety
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logo jump over products navigation bar
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logoAbout SSBFrequently Asked QuestionsPublicationsData Analysis ToolsNational Data SetsOther ResourcesAsk a Question
Juvenile Population Characteristics
Juveniles as Victims
Juveniles as Offenders
Juvenile Justice System Structure & Process
Overview
Related FAQs
Related Publications
Related Links
Case Flow Diagram
Law Enforcement & Juvenile Crime
Juveniles in Court
Juveniles on Probation
Juveniles in Corrections
Juvenile Reentry & Aftercare
Statistical Briefing Book Home

OJJDP logo

Printer-priendlyPrinter-friendly
Juveniled Justice System Structure & Process
Juveniles Tried as Adults
Q: Have states made it easier for juveniles to be tried as adults in criminal court?
A: Between 1992 and 1999, legislatures in nearly every state revised or rewrote their transfer laws to broaden the scope of transfer—lowering age/offense thresholds, moving away from individual and toward categorical handling, and shifting authority from judges to prosecutors.

States that changed their transfer laws, 1992-1999

Transfer law changed Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin
No Change Nebraska and Wyoming
  • Of the States making changes to transfer laws between 1992 and 1999, most enacted or made changes to their statutory exclusions.
  • 35 states created or expanded automatic transfer laws.
  • 27 states extended the reach of judicial waiver laws, lowering age requirements or otherwise broadening eligibility.
  • 13 states enacted new presumptive waiver laws.
  • 11 states strengthened prosecutor role in transfer, either expanding or enacting new prosecutorial discretion laws.

Internet citation: OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Online. Available: http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/structure_process/qa04107.asp?qaDate=1999. Released on October 31, 2009.

Adapted from Griffin, P. Different from Adults: An Updated Analysis of Juvenile Transfer and Blended Sentencing Laws, With Recommendations for Reform [Adobe Acrobat File] Pittsburgh, PA.: National Center for Juvenile Justice, 2008.

 

USA.gov | Privacy | Policies & Disclaimers | FOIA | Site Map | Ask a Question | OJJDP Home
A component of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice